XIIID
  • Disclaimer
  • Table of Contents
  • 1. Problem Statement
    • 1.1 Global Education Inequality
    • 1.2 Limitations of Traditional AI in Education
    • 1.3 AI and Blockchain: XIIID’s Integrated Approach
    • 1.4 XIIID: Building on RIIId’s Legacy
    • 1.5 XIIID: A Comprehensive Platform for Educational AI
  • 2. Technical Architecture
    • 2.1 XIIID AI Infrastructure and Foundation Model
    • 2.2 XIIID AI Studio
    • 2.3 AI Tutor System
    • 2.4 XIIID Blockchain Design
    • 2.5 Security and Audit Framework
  • 3. Tokenomics & Value Model
    • 3.1 Dual Token Structure Overview
    • 3.2 Token Allocation
    • 3.3 Lockup and Vesting Schedule
    • 3.4 Token Utility and Value Stabilization Mechanisms
    • 3.5 Staking Model
    • 3.6 RWA Token Model Linked to Educational IP
    • 3.7 NFT Integration with Educational Assets
  • 4. Ecosystem & Stakeholders
    • 4.1 Incentive Structure for Educational Stakeholders
    • 4.2 Marketplace and Ecosystem Integration
    • 4.3 Global Expansion Strategy
    • 4.4 Liquidity Management Strategy
  • 5. Governance & Sustainability
    • 5.1 Token Holder Governance System
    • 5.2 Decentralization Transition Plan
    • 5.3 Community Engagement and Transparency
    • 5.4 Technical Sustainability and Risk Management
  • 6. Strategic Roadmap
    • 6.1 Development and Expansion Phases
    • 6.2 Key Milestones
    • 6.3 Marketing and Community Expansion Strategy
  • 7. Team & Partners
    • Core Team
    • Team
    • Partners
  • 8.Conclusion
  • References
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF
  1. 1. Problem Statement

1.2 Limitations of Traditional AI in Education

Despite technical advances, current AI solutions have several limitations in addressing global educational challenges:

Limitations of Centralized Structures

  • Scalability Challenges: Centralized control of AI models by a single entity introduces bias in data and decision-making, limiting adaptability to diverse user needs and posing significant barriers to global scalability.

  • Data Sovereignty Issues: Centralized AI systems raise data sovereignty and privacy concerns, especially as educational data reveals sensitive insights into personal growth and achievement.

  • Difficulty Localizing: A single AI model struggles to accommodate diverse educational systems, cultural contexts, and linguistic characteristics needs, as centralized decision-making restricts the creation of region-specific solutions.

Constraints on Innovation and Value Distribution

  • Innovation Barriers: Closed systems limit participation from diverse educational experts, small startups, and individuals, slowing the advancement of educational AI development.

  • Unequal Value Distribution: In the educational ecosystem, contributors such as data providers, creators, and teachers often lack fair compensation, while benefits remain concentrated among a few entities.

  • Commercialization Bias: Development efforts prioritize commercially attractive education sectors, sidelining socially important but less commercial domains.

In response to these challenges, XIIID proposes a blockchain-based decentralized AI platform to achieve global scalability, foster innovation, and ensure equitable value distribution.

Previous1.1 Global Education InequalityNext1.3 AI and Blockchain: XIIID’s Integrated Approach

Last updated 13 days ago